<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spurrious Rhetoric, continued</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onely.org/2009/01/03/spurrious-rhetoric-continued-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onely.org/2009/01/03/spurrious-rhetoric-continued-2/</link>
	<description>Fresh perspectives on living solo.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 01:53:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alternet Explains Why Marriage Doesn&#8217;t Matter &#171; Onely: Single and Happy</title>
		<link>http://onely.org/2009/01/03/spurrious-rhetoric-continued-2/comment-page-1/#comment-6536</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alternet Explains Why Marriage Doesn&#8217;t Matter &#171; Onely: Single and Happy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 13:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onely.org/?p=1075#comment-6536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] this were the Daily Mail or some other trash news outlet, I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised at the caliber of commenters. But [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this were the Daily Mail or some other trash news outlet, I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised at the caliber of commenters. But [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: onely</title>
		<link>http://onely.org/2009/01/03/spurrious-rhetoric-continued-2/comment-page-1/#comment-376</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[onely]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 02:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onely.org/?p=1075#comment-376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Go ahead, Kristen!! I too was puzzling about the lack of comments on her post. I bet you&#039;re right--I just went and looked for your &quot;zinger&quot; and STILL &quot;no comments&quot;.   Heh.

I KNEW crossing arms was a silly indicator of deception, I KNEW it. Thanks! 

--CC]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go ahead, Kristen!! I too was puzzling about the lack of comments on her post. I bet you&#8217;re right&#8211;I just went and looked for your &#8220;zinger&#8221; and STILL &#8220;no comments&#8221;.   Heh.</p>
<p>I KNEW crossing arms was a silly indicator of deception, I KNEW it. Thanks! </p>
<p>&#8211;CC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: onely</title>
		<link>http://onely.org/2009/01/03/spurrious-rhetoric-continued-2/comment-page-1/#comment-375</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[onely]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onely.org/?p=1075#comment-375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PWI and Kristen -- thank you for your affirmative commentary!!! THANK GOD we here at Onely aren&#039;t completely crazy. :)

-- L]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PWI and Kristen &#8212; thank you for your affirmative commentary!!! THANK GOD we here at Onely aren&#8217;t completely crazy. <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>&#8211; L</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristen</title>
		<link>http://onely.org/2009/01/03/spurrious-rhetoric-continued-2/comment-page-1/#comment-371</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kristen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 04:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onely.org/?p=1075#comment-371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Funny, I read another study (wish I could remember where) that said crossing your arms was a power position that many people take when facing challenges or making important decisions. I&#039;m sure her tone immediately put the single woman on the defensive. 

Is she trained in lie detection? I&#039;m a trained interrogator and counterintelligence specialist, and I AM trained in lie detection. Crossing your arms is NOT a deception indicator. Writing dizzy-broad articles like Dr. Spurr&#039;s, however, is a clear case of &quot;something ain&#039;t right here.&quot; 

She does not write like any psychologist/psychiatrist I&#039;ve ever known. I emailed that article to an old friend who heads the psychiatry program at a major university, and she laughed at it. &quot;No way she&#039;s trained,&quot; was the assessment. I think she&#039;s just making all that crap up to back her biases and give some weight to opinions that don&#039;t deserve it.

I find it hard to believe that this story generated zero comments. I&#039;m sure it&#039;s the all in the &quot;premoderated&quot; disclaimer. I just sent her a zinger, but it won&#039;t get published. No surprise, since any evidence that doesn&#039;t support her Stone-Age logic has clearly been ignored from the outset. I found it especially laughable that she doesn&#039;t treat or get emails from happy single women. Talk about blinding flash of the obvious! She only gets communications from miserable people because she&#039;s...wait for it...a SHRINK. At least ostensibly. 

I think she absolutely invented the women she uses as case studies. Or maybe she just attracts a particular brand of dizzy broad.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny, I read another study (wish I could remember where) that said crossing your arms was a power position that many people take when facing challenges or making important decisions. I&#8217;m sure her tone immediately put the single woman on the defensive. </p>
<p>Is she trained in lie detection? I&#8217;m a trained interrogator and counterintelligence specialist, and I AM trained in lie detection. Crossing your arms is NOT a deception indicator. Writing dizzy-broad articles like Dr. Spurr&#8217;s, however, is a clear case of &#8220;something ain&#8217;t right here.&#8221; </p>
<p>She does not write like any psychologist/psychiatrist I&#8217;ve ever known. I emailed that article to an old friend who heads the psychiatry program at a major university, and she laughed at it. &#8220;No way she&#8217;s trained,&#8221; was the assessment. I think she&#8217;s just making all that crap up to back her biases and give some weight to opinions that don&#8217;t deserve it.</p>
<p>I find it hard to believe that this story generated zero comments. I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s the all in the &#8220;premoderated&#8221; disclaimer. I just sent her a zinger, but it won&#8217;t get published. No surprise, since any evidence that doesn&#8217;t support her Stone-Age logic has clearly been ignored from the outset. I found it especially laughable that she doesn&#8217;t treat or get emails from happy single women. Talk about blinding flash of the obvious! She only gets communications from miserable people because she&#8217;s&#8230;wait for it&#8230;a SHRINK. At least ostensibly. </p>
<p>I think she absolutely invented the women she uses as case studies. Or maybe she just attracts a particular brand of dizzy broad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: professor what if</title>
		<link>http://onely.org/2009/01/03/spurrious-rhetoric-continued-2/comment-page-1/#comment-369</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[professor what if]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 01:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onely.org/?p=1075#comment-369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CC,
No, you are not in denial! Does this Dr. Spurr cover how UNHAPPY many non-onelys are, married women in particular? 
On another note, did you happen to watch the NY Eve tv coverage with Seacrest and Pickler? Practically EVERY person in 2009 was &quot;GOING TO HAVE MORE FUN&quot; by getting married! Ugh and ugh. As if hooking up monogamy style is the best way to improve a year. Puke.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CC,<br />
No, you are not in denial! Does this Dr. Spurr cover how UNHAPPY many non-onelys are, married women in particular?<br />
On another note, did you happen to watch the NY Eve tv coverage with Seacrest and Pickler? Practically EVERY person in 2009 was &#8220;GOING TO HAVE MORE FUN&#8221; by getting married! Ugh and ugh. As if hooking up monogamy style is the best way to improve a year. Puke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

